Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8737 (RAJ)

SMT PREMLATA SHARMA W/O PRAKASH SHARMA v. SANDEEP SORAL S/O JAGENDRA NATH SORAL

CW/9721/2026 · 2026-05-27

Bipin Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:22465] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9721/2026 Smt Premlata Sharma W/o Prakash Sharma, Aged About 62 Years, Resident Of Flat No. 203, Shrinath Enclave, Opposite Of Manoj Talkij, Kota Junction, Kota. ----Petitioner-Defendant Versus Sandeep Soral S/o Jagendra Nath Soral, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Flat No. C-101, First Floor Shrinath Apartment, Near R.m.s Rest House, Kota Junction, Kota. ----Respondent-Plaintiff For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shailesh Prakash Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Order 27/05/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, submits that although his application for sending the document in question to the FSL for verification of the signatures of notary on the disputed document has been rejected, he may be permitted to obtain a private expert opinion at his own cost. He further submits that if any such report is produced, the learned Trial Court may consider the same in accordance with law. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of the submission made at Bar, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to obtain a private expert opinion, and if any such expert opinion is placed on record, [2026:RJ-JP:22465] (2 of 2) [CW-9721/2026] the learned Trial Court is expected to decide the said application in accordance with law. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/04