Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8737 (ALL)

SHASHANK v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WPIL/2270/2026 · 2026-09-22

Kunal Ravi Singh, Siddhartha Varma

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2270 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RA VI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents; Sri Tejasvi Mishra, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4; Sri Manu Saxena, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.6 and Sri Ashwini Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.7. 2. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the encroachment made by the private individuals over the Gaon Sabha land then the Court is of the definite view that the petitioner has an efficacious remedy of filing an application under section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code. No interference is, therefore, warranted in this case. 3. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. September 23, 2026 GS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satyendra Narayan Singh, Tarun Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashwini Kumar Srivastava, C.S.C., Manu Saxena, Tejasvi Misra (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Shashank .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM SONI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad