Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8736 (CAL)

MOHUYA DAS ALIAS SNEHA v. UTPAL KR DAS

FAT/223/2025 · 2026-01-20

Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, Supratim Bhattacharya

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

20th January, 2026 (AK) 28 F.A.T 223 of 2025 IA No: CAN 1 of 2025 CAN 2 of 2025 Mohuya Das alias Sneha Vs. Sri Utpal Kumar Das Mr. Anirban Roy ...for the appellant. Mr. Ayan Mitra Mr. Subhadip Halder ...for the respondent. 1. A receipt filed by learned counsel for the respondent with regard to the service of copy of the affidavit-in-opposition be kept on record. 2. We find from the records that the appellant remained unrepresented on December 24, 2025, when the matter was last called onfor hearing. 3. Even today, at the time of call, none appears to move the applications. 4. Accordingly, CAN 1 of 2025 is dismissed for default. 5. Consequentially, FAT 223 of 2025 stands dismissed as time-barred. 6. CAN 2 of 2025 is also disposed of in the light of the above observations. 7. There will be no order as to costs. 2 8. Urgent photostat copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.) (Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)