Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8734 (ALL)

AADIL v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/34074/2026 · 2026-09-23

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34074 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sl. No. 07 out of 109) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Umesh Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned State Law Officer and also perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 68 of 2026, under Sections 3/5/8 of Cow Slaughter Act and Sections 3/25 of Arms Act, Police Station - Awagarh, District - Etah, during the pendency of trial. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, nature of offence, severity of punishment and also considering the fact that the applicant is not named in the FIR, his implication rests primarily on the basis of fake information received from a squealer, alongside the criminal history has been explained and the period of incarceration already undergone, this Court prima facie finds it a fit case to release the applicant on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant- Aadil, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 6. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. September 24, 2026 Siddhant Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Umesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Krishan Pahal,J.) Aadil .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad