Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8731 (JHR)

BABITA DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./1395/2025 · 2026-01-16

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:1157 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1395 of 2025 ------ Babita Devi, aged about 37 years, W/o Late Dilip Mandal, R/o Simla Nagar, Dhaiya, P.O.-I.S.M., P.S.-Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Bashudev Mandal, aged about 76 years, S/o Late Kalipada Mandal; 3. Shobha Mandal, aged about 67 years, W/o Bashudev Mandal; Both are R/o Simla Nagar, Dhaiya, P.O.-I.S.M., P.S.-Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sidharth Sudhanshu, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, Addl.P.P. For the OP 2 & 3 : Mrs. J. Mazumdar, Advocate ------ Order No:-05 Dated:-16-01-2026 Heard the parties. Both the parties are present in the Court today. It is agreed to between the parties that the opposite party no.2 & 3 have no objection if the petitioner constructs a Kitchen and a Washroom towards northern portion of the existing bedroom at her cost and the opposite party no.2 & 3 will not cause any hindrance in construction of the same. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the considered view that there is no justifiable reason to cancel the bail granted to the opposite party no.2 & 3. Accordingly, this Cr.M.P. is disposed of on the ground of the settlement arrived at between the parties. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 16/01/2026 Abhiraj/