Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8729 (CAL)

ACHINTYA KUMAR KONER v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/19530/2025 · 2026-03-10

Bivas Pattanayak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10.03.2026 Sl. No.30(DL) Ct. No.14 srm IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE W.P.A. No. 19530 of 2025 Achintya Kumar Koner Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mrs. Debjani Sahu …for the Petitioner. Mr. Mihir Kundu …for the State. 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. By the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks for direction upon the respondent authorities for disbursement of interest on delayed payment of gratuity and arrear pension from the date following the date of retirement of the petitioner till the date of actual payment @ 18% per annum. 3. The petitioner contends that he was an Assistant Teacher of Nota F.P. Schoo, Nityanandapur, District Purba Bardhaman, who retired from service on superannuation on 31st March, 2020. The Pension Payment Order was issued on 9th February, 2021. The gratuity and arrear pension was received by the petitioner on 1st April, 2021. However, no interest has been paid to the petitioner. Hence, this writ petition. 4. Mrs. Debjani Sahu, learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that there is delay in disbursement of gratuity and arrear pension and as such the petitioner is entitled 2 to receive interest on the delayed payment of gratuity and arrear pension. 5. Mr. Mihir Kundu, learned Advocate for the State leaves the matter to the discretion of the Court. 6. Though there is delay in making such claim, however, delay per se cannot defeat the valuable right of the petitioner. Relief may be granted to the writ petitioner in spite of the delay if it does not affect the right of third parties. [See: Union of India versus Tarsem Singh reported in (2008) 3 SCC 648] 7. From the aforesaid contentions made in the writ petition, it is found that the there is considerable delay in disbursement of the gratuity and arrear pension. It is the bounden duty of the State to disburse all the pensionary benefits to the employee forthwith, failing which the employee is entitled to interest on the aforesaid amount. 8. Accordingly, respondent No.2, the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance and respondent No.3, the Treasury Officer, Burdwan-I are directed to disburse interest @ 8% per annum on the gratuity and arrear pension in favour of the petitioner by way of pensionary benefits from the date following the date of retirement of the petitioner till the date of actual payment. Such payment is to be made within a period of eight weeks from date of communication of this order. 9. Learned advocate for the petitioner is directed to communicate this order to respondent No.2, the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group 3 Insurance and respondent No.3, the Treasury Officer, Burdwan-I, for necessary compliance. 10. With the above direction, the writ petition being WPA 19530 of 2025 stands disposed of. 11. Since no affidavits have been called for, the allegation made in the writ petition is deemed to be not admitted. 12. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 13. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. 14. There shall be no order as to costs. 15. Urgent Photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of all necessary legal formalities. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)