Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body
2026 DAILYLAW 8728 (PNJ)
ASHOK KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB
CRM-M/10588/2026 · 2026-04-22
Rupinderjit Chahal
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8728 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8728 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-10588-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr.No.234+115 CRM-M-10588-2026 Decided on : 22.04.2026 Ashok Kumar ...... Petitioner
Versus State of Punjab ...... Respondent CORAM :
*** Present : Mr.Amjad Khan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ekom Pal Saggo, AAG, Punjab. ***
, J (ORAL)
!"# $ %& ' ()(# &
&
*+, %)(#!
#) )()('
&
!()' !-' !- ' !-"' ! ' ()$ +. ( ' /- 0
() +.
1' . % ' $ %& ( $
&
&
&
2
*+, MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.04.23 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh
CRM-M-10588-2026 (O&M) 2 # 3
2
&
4
&
3
4
' &
4
3
&
()(!
*+, 5
&
()(
)
' &
3
4 6 $ . 7 4
&
& . $
. 4
(!)(()(-'
.,88()(- .,88/()(-
4
9
#) )()(
9 4
&
'
& 4
3
'
2
&
4
&
9
' &
4
! 3
2 4
& &
However, 4
petitioner is the first time offender as he is not involved in any other case.
24 & & & ' 4 MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.04.23 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-10588-2026 (O&M) 3 ) # : 4 & & . $ .: 4 & : : & 4 : ' & ' 4 & 2 & 44 & ( . + - , & ' 2 ; . & ' & 4 ' & & ' ( . + & + 4 4 ' & <
.< 8& <.=8 + & Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No > ? @
<% MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.04.23 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh