Tamim Ansari @ Mohamed Ansari v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, South Gate
CRL OP(MD)/1898/2026 · 2026-02-02
S Srimathy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 87279 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 87279 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP(MD). No.1898 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 02/02/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD). No.1898 of 2026 Tamim Ansari @ Mohamed Ansar ... Petitioner Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, South Gate Police Station, Madurai District. (In Crime No. 356 of 2025). ... Respondent PRAYER :- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 to modify the condition that imposed in Cr.M.P. No. 7529 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.4, Madurai dt. 03.11.2025 in so far as the Condition no. B is concern and consequently direct to the petitioner to report before the JM, No.4, Madurai District. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Jainul Abudheen
Advocate For Respondent : Mr.S.S. Manoj
Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For intervenor : Mr. R. Branav 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.1898 of 2026
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking modification of the condition imposed in Cr.M.P. No. 7529 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No. IV, Madurai, dated 03.11.2025, insofar as Condition No. B is concerned, and consequently to direct the petitioner to report before the Judicial Magistrate No. IV, Madurai District.
2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) submitted that there are 15 previous cases pending against the petitioner. In the present case, though the petitioner was directed to report before the concerned Police Station for 15 days, he has not properly complied with the said condition.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is being influenced and threatened by the de facto complainant, and on the basis of such allegations, the police are insisting upon repayment of the amount. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.1898 of 2026
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and also taking into account the reasons stated by the petitioner, Condition No. B imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No. IV, Madurai, in Cr.M.P. No. 7529 of 2025, dated 03.11.2025 is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of 30 days, and thereafter as and when required for interrogation before the respondent police.
5. With the above modification, this Criminal Original Petition is
disposed of. 02.02.2026 TRP Index : yes / no Internet : yes / no TO 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.1898 of 2026 1.Inspector of Police, South Gate Police Station, Madurai District.
2. Inspector of Police, South Gate Police Station, Madurai District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.1898 of 2026 S.SRIMATHY,J TRP
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.1898 of 2026 Date : 02/02/2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis