Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8727 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR SINGH v. MR. P. GURU PRASAD, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, U.P.

CAPL/5962/2026 · 2026-09-22

Vikas Budhwar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5962 of 2026 Court No. - 53 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. The present contempt application has been preferred alleging willful defiance of the order dated 12.03.2025 passed in Writ-A No. 3428 of 2026, order whereof is quoted hereinunder.- "1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for respondent no.3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 09.01.2026 in view of judgment rendered in Principal Special Appeal No.607 of 2024 (State of U.P. and 2 others Vs. Chandra Mohan Yadav) which stood disposed of vide order dated 06.05.2025 and to settle all the pending retiral dues in favour of petitioner including pension and other benefits accruing from unblemished services of the petitioner, which exercise may be undertaken within stipulated period of time which may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court in exercise of extra- ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India." 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has filed a representation dated 9.1.2026 before the respondent no. 2, however, till date the aforesaid representation of the petitioner has not been decided by the concerned authority. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the representation of the petitioner would be decided by respondent no. 2 in accordance with Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhai Kumar Singh, Devi Prasad Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ajay Kumar Singh .....Applicant(s) Mr. P. Guru Prasad, Principal Secretary, Ministry Of Urban Development, U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) law in a time bound manner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is hereby directed that respondent no. 2 shall decide the representation dated 9.1.2026 filed by the petitioner in light of the direction issued in Special Appeal No.607 of 2024 (State of U.P. and others Vs. Chandra Mohan Yadav ) within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed of." 2. Today, instructions have been produced, according to which, the order of the writ Court stands complied with on 16.09.2026 deciding the claim. A copy of the same be served upon the learned counsel for the applicant. 3. Since there has been substantial compliance, the present contempt application is consigned to record leaving it open to the applicant to question the same before appropriate proceedings. 4. Instructions filed today are taken on record and marked as Appendix 'A'. September 23, 2026 Rajesh CAPL No. 5962 of 2026 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad