[2026:RJ-JP:22573] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9723/2026 1. Kamal S/o Rahman, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Vill-Rithat Teh-F P Jhirka Nuh Mewat Hr. Owner Of Truck No. And Hr.74.b.6686. 2. Aas Mohammad S/o Chatar Khan, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village-Khori Kalan Tauru Tehsil Tauru Nuh Mewat Hr. Owner Of Truck No. Hr.74.b.8262. 3. Sokeen S/o Magru, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Vpo Kadarpur Teh - Badshahpur Distt - Gurugram Gurgaon Hr. Owner Of Truck No. Hr.55.al.8701. And. Hr.55.al.8396. 4. Arman Group Company, Through Prop. Niyaz Mohammad S/o Fazruddin @ Fazar Khan Aged Aoubt 44 Years. R/o Behrampatti, Dhoj, Faridabad Hr. Owner Of Truck No. Hr.38.ab.9939. 5. Aarif Khan S/o Ibraheem, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Malioy Ki Dhani Teh - Jamwaramgarh Jpr Dondalia Ka Bas Baded 145 Mewat Hr. Owner Of Truck No. Rj.14.gq.8033. 6. Aslam S/o Abdul Haj, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Dadhka Po Lohina Palwal Hr. Owner Of Truck No. Hr.73.b.0096. And. Hr.73.b.9200. 7. Aslam S/o Abdul Haj, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Shop No. 11 Near Masjid Dadka, Dadka Road Hodal Near Masjid Dadka, Palwal, Hr. Owner Of Truck Hr.73.b.0088. 8. Azad S/o Sohrab, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Nangla Ahsanpur Khatela Sara 86 Khatela Sarai Palwal Hr. Owner Of Truck No. Hr.73.b.1477. 9. Manoj Kumar Giri S/o Sohahpal Giri, Aged About 59 Years, R/o 0520 J/5 Kulsera Greater Noida Gautam Buddha Nagar Uttar Pradesh. Owner Of Truck No. Up.16.ht.7523. 10. Aas Mohammad S/o Rahmat, Aged About 43 Years, R/o 132 Neemli Alwar Teh - Tijara Alwar Rajasthan. Owner Of Truck No. Rj.40.ga.4805. And. Rj.40.gb.5858. 11. Sajid S/o Iliyas, Aged About 39 Years, R/o 494 Ward No. 6 Near Jama Masjid Tijara To Firozpur Main Road Neemli Alwar Rj. Owner Of Truck No. Rj.40.gb.2683. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Regional Transport Officer, Sikar. 3. Regional Transport Officer, Alwar. 4. District Transport Officer, Kotputali District Jaipur. 5. Regional Transport Officer, Bharatpur. [2026:RJ-JP:22573] (2 of 3) [CW-9723/2026] 6. Regional Transport Officer, Beawar. 7. Regional Transport Officer, Kekri. 8. Regional Transport Officer, Ajmer. 9. Regional Trasport Officer, Jhunjhunu. 10. Regional Trasport Officer, Jaipur First. 11. Regional Trasport Officer, Jaipur Second 12. Regional Transport Officer, Bhiwadi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jamasi For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with Ms. Ritika Naruka, AAAG Mr. Tanishq Aditya Panwar Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore, AAAG & Mr. Anshuman Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 27/05/2026 1. Learned counsel for both the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present matter is squarely covered by the judgments passed by the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court in the matters of Kanwar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.1 and Mustak & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.2 2. In view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned / possessed by the petitioners were suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the petitioners were not afforded the opportunity of hearing and that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their families. 1 S.B. C.W.P. No.9721/2025 2 S.B. C.W.P. No.20073/2025 [2026:RJ-JP:22573] (3 of 3) [CW-9723/2026] 3. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to the condition that the petitioners will produce their vehicles before the Transport Department, who will examine and inspect the vehicles’ make and design; and in case any mechanical alteration or overloading is found, a detailed inventory shall be prepared and appropriate orders shall be passed strictly in accordance with law. 4. This arrangement shall be valid only for carrying the vehicles to the respective office of DTO for the aforesaid verification/inspection and shall not authorize the vehicles to ply on the road for any other purpose. 5. The petitioners, along with their vehicle concerned, shall report to / before the respective DTOs who passed the order of suspension of registration of the subject vehicles, on 10.06.2026, preferably between 11:00 A.M. to 01:00 P.M. Thereafter, due reply shall be filed within a period of 15 days by the petitioners. 6. Audience with respect to the same will be provided by the competent authority on 25.06.2026. Adjudication of the same shall be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days. 7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 8. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV/84