Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8720 (ORI)

MOHSIN KHAN @ SK. MOHSIN KHAN v. STATE OF ODISHA

ABLAPL/2137/2026 · 2026-04-21

S K Panigrahi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No. 2137 of 2026 Mohsin Khan @ Sk. Mohsin Khan ..…... Petitioner(s) Mr. Bhabani Sankar Mishra, Adv. -Versus- State of Odisha ……. Opposite Party (s) Mr. Raj Bhusan Dash, ASC CORAM: DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI ORDER 21.04.2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. The Petitioner apprehending his arrest in Dharmasala P.S. Case No.281 of 2025 corresponding to C.T. Case No.941 of 2025, pending in the court of learned J.M.F.C., Chandikhole for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 85, 80(2), 103(1),3(5) of B.N.S. 2023 read with Section 4 of D.P. Act., has filed this petition under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for release on pre-arrest bail. 3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 23-Apr-2026 11:44:41 Signature Not Verified 2 4. The prosecution case, in short, is that one Suhana Biwi on 14.05.2025 at about 1 A.M. reported in writing before the IIC, Dharmasala PS alleging therein that her daughter named Arju Nesa had got married to the present Petitioner as per the Muslims Rites and Customs on 23.08.2019 and her daughter was leading a happy conjugal life. But, since last four years of her marriage, her daughter was not able to give birth to any child, her in-law’s members tortured her daughter frequently. On 13.05.2025, she received information that her daughter had died and other general allegations are also there. Hence, this case. 5. Considering the submission and keeping in view the nature of accusation as to the role of this Petitioner as also the manner of commission of offences as those emanate from the materials on record; I do not find it to be a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the Petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the ABLAPL is dismissed. ( Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Murmu