Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8720 (AP)

K.SANKAR RAJU v. STATE OF AP

CRLRC/139/2019 · 2026-08-23

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010034192019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOs: 139 of 2019 and 266 of 2021 CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOs: 139 of 2019 Between: 1. K.SANKAR RAJU, S/O K. MADHAVA RAJU AGED ABUT 57 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE R/O 439, RAGHAMAYURI, GREEN HILLS, NANNURI VILLAGE, ORVAKAL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT AMARAVATHI 2. NANDURI SRINIVASA RAJU, S/O VENKATA NARASA RAJU RIO SANTHINAGAR, BHADRACHALAM, BHADRADRI-KOTHAGUDEM DISTRICT. 3. S VIVEKANANDA, R/O SANTHINAGAR, BHADRACHALAM, BHADRADRI-KOTHAGUDEM DISTRICT. 4. N VENKATA NARASA RAJU, RIO SANTHINAGAR, BHADRACHALAM, BHADRADRI-KOTHAGUDEM DISTRICT. 5. N NIRMALA, R/O SANTHINAGAR, BHADRACHALAM, BHADRADRI- KOTHAGUDEM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.139 of 2019 and 266 of 2021 Dated 24.08.2026 CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 266/2021 Between: 1. NANDURI SRINIVASA RAJU, S/O. VENKATA NARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, SOFTWARE ENGINEER, IBM, HI -TECH CITY, BANGALORE CITY. 2. S.VIVEKANANDA,, S/O. APPALA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, PRIVATE SERVICE R/O. BEERAMGUDA, HYDERABAD CITY. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE, REP. BY SHO OF ORVAKAL P.S., ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. U RAMANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VIRUPAKSHA DATTATREYA GOUDA 2. MOVVA DEVISREE 3. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: The Respondent No2/Accused No.1 is present and submits that Respondent No.4, namely N. Venkata Narasa Raju, died on 15.05.2019. Hence the case against Respondent No.4 stands dismissed as abated. 2. Respondent No.3/Accused No.2 and the de-facto complainant are also present. 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.139 of 2019 and 266 of 2021 Dated 24.08.2026 3. Respondent No.5 is absent. In view of the submissions made by the parties, it appears that there is a possibility of settlement through mediation. 4. According, Ms. S. Siva Kumari, learned Counsel, is appointed as the Mediator in this case. 5. The learned Mediator conducted the mediation proceedings and submitted a report. The said report is hereby accepted. 6. In view of the Mediator’s report, the Criminal Revision Cases are liable to be disposed of as compromised. 7. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Cases are disposed of as compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 24.08.2026 KMS 4 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.139 of 2019 and 266 of 2021 Dated 24.08.2026 155 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NOs: 139 of 2019 and 266 of 2021 Date:24.08.2026 KMS