Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8718 (BOM)

AJIT PRABHAKAR KULKARNI v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ABA/1125/2026 · 2026-09-16

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

910-ABA-1125-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1125 OF 2026 Ajit Prabhakar Kulkarni …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents Dr. Pradeep Kumar Pardeshi a/w Anushka Martis & Saurav Dilip Yadav, for the Applicant. Mr. P. P. Jadhav, APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Amogh Karandikar, for Respondent No.2. PSI Sunil Jagadale, Warje Malwadi Police Station, Pune City, present. CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED: 16 SEPTEMBER 2026 PC:- 1. Heard Dr. Pardeshi, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant and Mr. Karandikar, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.2. 2. Dr. Pardeshi, learned Counsel for the Applicant tenders written submissions and also argues the matter. 3. The Applicant is a Valuer and, on the basis of his Valuation Reports, Kalyan Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. has sanctioned loans to about 41 persons, and the total loan amount is about Rs.91 Lakhs. However, thereafter it transpired that the gold which has been Page 1 Arjun ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Digitally signed by ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date: 2026.09.17 12:47:18 +0530 910-ABA-1125-2026.DOC given as security by these 41 persons for availing gold loans was not the genuine gold and, therefore, inter alia, an FIR came to be lodged against the Applicant. 4. After arguing the matter for some time, as the Court is not inclined to grant relief of anticipatory bail, Dr. Pardeshi, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant, on instructions of the Applicant, seeks withdrawal of the Anticipatory Bail Application. 5. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 2 Arjun