HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4283 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states that certain relevant documents and averments have been inadvertently left out during drafting of the writ petition, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars and details. Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve a copy of the writ petition to be filed afresh upon learned counsel appearing for the caveator respondent nos.5 and 6, whenever it is filed next. September 24, 2026 Anil Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Bind, Samsher Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C., Nigamendra Shukla, Rahul Kumar Pandey (Arun Kumar,J.) Ram Shiromani .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad