NEMPAL SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/14827/2026 · 2026-09-22
Manish Kumar Nigam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8707 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8707 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14827 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:
"a) issue a writ, order or direction in the Mandamus commanding the respondents to consider and determine the entitlement of the petitioners to financial/pay upgradation under the Government Orders dated 05.11.2014 and 03.03.2015, after examining their complete service record; b) Deoria Issue a writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to take into consideration the departmental orders issued in Bareilly, Gorakhpur, and other districts, whereby the corresponding benefit under the aforesaid Government Orders has already been granted similarly situated police personnel; c) Issue a writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to specifically examine the petitioners' claim in the light of the fact that the petitioners were appointed as Sub-Inspectors on 01.04.1992 and 26.06.1993, whereas subsequently appointed Sub-Inspectors, including those appointed in 2015 and 2016, have been extended the corresponding financial/pay benefit."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is seeking Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shrikant Chaturvedi, Vijay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Nempal Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
financial/pay upgradation under the Government Orders dated 05.11.2014 and 03.03.2015, after examining their complete service record. In this regard, the petitioner has moved a representation/application which is pending consideration. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate to direct the respondent authority to decide the representation/application of the petitioner within a time frame as fixed by this Court. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent authority to consider and decide the aforementioned representation/application of the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment.
September 23, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIA No. 14827 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad