Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
10.04.2026 Court No.28 Item No.65 ssi CRM (A) 829 of 2026
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Lalgola Police Station Case No.237 dated 20.03.2025 under Sections 21 (C ) /29 of the NDPS Act. And In the matter of: Anarul Sk. …. Petitioner
Mr. Arnab Chatterjee Mr. Avik Ghosh Ms. Debolina Roy …for the petitioner
Mr. Joydeep Biswas Mr. Debanik Das
..for the State
Report filed on behalf of the State is taken on record.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that there are no incriminating materials available against the present petitioner except for the statement of a co-accused which is not admissible in evidence.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. However, he submits that no CDR record or money trail could be established between the petitioner and the co- accused. There is no criminal antecedent of the petitioner. Other than the statement of a co-accused, there is hardly any other incriminating circumstance appearing against the present petitioner.
In view of the above, the petitioner has been able to rebut the restriction contained in Section 37 of the NDPS Act and considering the materials available in the case diary against the present petitioner
2 and the fact that charge sheet has been submitted, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and on further conditions that the petitioner shall surrender before the learned jurisdictional Court and pray for bail within four weeks from this date and shall attend the jurisdictional Court regularly. The petitioner shall not threaten or intimidate the witnesses.
The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)