NINDALI RAGHURAMAIAH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/9990/2026 · 2026-04-15
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 870 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 870 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010187972026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 9990/2026 Between:
1. NINDALI RAGHURAMAIAH, S/O KRISHNAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, OCC.CULTIVATION, R/O VALLIPADU, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. NINDALI SAMPUMAMMA,, W/O NIDALI RAGHURAMAIAH, AGED 56 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O VALLIPADU, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. EKAMBARAM RAMMOHAM,, S/O EKAMBARAM SUBRAHMANYAM, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O KALLUM, KANDRIKA, DORAVARISATRAM MANDALAM, TIMPATHI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
4. EKAMBARAM RAJESWARI,, W/O EKAMBARAM RAMMOHAN, AGED 36 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O KALLUM, KANDRIKA, DORAVARISATRAM MANDALAM, TIMPATHI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
5. TIRUMALAPUDI HARIKRISHNA,, S/O TIRUMALAPUDI MUNI KRISHNAIAH, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O STATE BANK STREET, VIDYANAGAR, CHENDODU, KOTA MANDAL, TIMPATHI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
6. TIMMALAPUDI SWATHI,, W/O TIMMALAPUDI HARIKRISHNA, AGED 33 YEARS, R/O OLD STATE BANK STREET, CHENDODU, TIMPATHI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER(S)
2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.9990 of 2026 Dated 16.04.2026
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. THE DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DARGAMITTA POLICE STATION, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, DARGAMITTA POLICE STATION, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
5. CENTRAL CRIME STATION NELLORE CCS, NEAR ATMAKUR BUS STAND, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
6. KALYANA RAJU, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC.
INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DARGAMITTA POLICE STATION, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
7. MAHENDRA REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. POLICE CONSTABLE WORKING IN DARGAMITTA POLICE STATION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
8. SEETHARAMAIAH, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. INSPEETOR OF POLICE CENTRAL CRIME STATION, NELLORE (CCS), SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
9. SHAIK SYDANI BEGUM, W/O MEERA MOHIDDIN AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, RFO D.NO.23-3-615, 11TH STREET, PODALAKUR ROAD, NELLORE CITY, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.C
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
VALLURU CHETAN SUSHEEL Counsel for the Respondent(S):
3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.9990 of 2026 Dated 16.04.2026
GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
“…to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent police in calling the petitioners to the police stations namely Dargamitta Police Station and CCS Police Station Nellore without any crime registered against them and in threatening them with dire consequences in the event of their failure to produce the missing persons as illegal arbitraiy and violative of Articles 14 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent police not to summon the petitioners to the said police stations except in accordance with law and to pass….”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader.
3. Mr. V. Chetan Susheel, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that, without there being any case registered against the petitioners, the respondent police are unnecessarily calling the petitioners to the police station and subjecting them to harassment.
4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that respondent No.9 has submitted a complaint, based on which a case in Crime No.143 of 2026 under the head “Woman Missing” was registered at Dargamitta Police Station on 06.08.2025 by respondent No.4, and investigation was taken up. The petitioners were called to the police station just for the purpose of investigation. The
4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.9990 of 2026 Dated 16.04.2026
petitioners were neither arraigned as accused nor shown as suspects in the FIR lodged by respondent No.9.
5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, and recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader and the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondent police not to call henceforth the petitioners to the police station without any basis and not to interfere with their liberty. Further, it is made clear that, in the investigation, if it is revealed that the petitioners have also played any role in the commission of the offence, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to proceed in accordance with law.
6. With the above observations and directions, the Writ Petition is
disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 16.04.2026 RSI
5 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.9990 of 2026 Dated 16.04.2026
136 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 9990 of 2026
Date: 16.04.2026 RSI