Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 5545 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Ashutosh Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Akhilesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate for Respondents-2 and 3.
2. At this stage, the Court finds that if there is no other legal impediment the outcome of order dated 21.09.2022 passed in Writ-A No. 1037 of 2011 (Shridhar Pandey vs. State of U.P. and others), 2022:AHC:155634 be implemented and petitioner may not be denied his benefit on a sole ground that he has not filed a certified copy of said order immediately before concerned respondent.
3. Learned counsel appearing for Respondents-2 and 3 fairly submits that effect of order be looked into by concerned respondent.
4. In aforesaid circumstances, petitioner is granted liberty to file certified copy of aforesaid order so that respondent may consider its effect. So far as interest part, if any, is concerned, it will be considered only from the date petitioner submits certified copy of aforesaid order.
5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. April 20, 2026 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pratik Ranjan Singh, Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Sharma, C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Shridhar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad