[2026:RJ-JP:22345] `HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1195/2024 Sonu S/o Sukhpal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Raghunathgarh Colony, Police Station Naugavan, District Alwar (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Bacchu Singh, H.c. No. 1189, Police Station Sadar, Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar for Ms. Vijay Laxmi Jangid For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitender Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. GA JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 26/05/2026 1. By way of filing the instant petition, a prayer has been made to quash the F.I.R. No. 701/2023, registered with police station Sadar, District Alwar for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 120B of IPC and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there no case is made out against the petitioner to connect him with the alleged offence and he has been falsely impleaded as accused. Hence interference of this Court is warranted. 3. Per contra, Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the aforesaid submissions and submitted that after investigation, prima facie case has been found against the petitioner. The petitioner is absconding since the date of registration of the impugned F.I.R. [2026:RJ-JP:22345] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1195/2024] and he is not appearing before the Investigating Agency. Hence, interference of this Court is not warranted and the instant petition is liable to be rejected. 4. Heard and considered the submission made at the Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. The allegations levelled in the impugned F.I.R. reveal commission of a cognizable offence. The correctness of the allegations cannot be examined by this Court in exercise of its inherent powers contained under Section 482 Cr.P.C. This Court cannot conduct a fishing and roving inquiry to find out the truth behind the allegation levelled against the petition. Certainly, this task has assigned to the Investigating Officer, who has thoroughly investigated the matter ad found prima facie case against the petitioner. 6. Since the petitioner is absconding from the date of registration of the impugned F.I.R., this Court is not inclined to allow the instant petition and grant the relief as sought for in the instant petition. 7. In the light of the observations made hereinabove, the instant petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to raise an available defences/grounds which have taken before this Court at the appropriate stage of the trial, before the Trial Court. 8. Stay applications and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J RACHNA/30