Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8697 (DEL)

HARDEEP SINGH v. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS

W.P.(C)/6253/2026 · 2026-05-07

Amit Bansal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) 6253/2026 $~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6253/2026 with CM APPL. 30743/2026 HARDEEP SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Khari, Advocate. versus THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Chopra, Standing Counsel for MCD with Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocate. Ms. Rachita Garg, Advocate for R-2. (Through video-conferencing) Mr. R.K. Dhawan, Standing Counsel for DDA with Ms. Nisha Dhawan, Mr. Pawan Karan Deo & Mr. V.K. Teng, Advocates for R-3. Mr. Ravikant Srivastava, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Robert Laishram, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 07.05.2026 1. The present writ petition has been seeking a direction to respondents to initiate demolition action against the construction being raised at Khasra No. 14/15/4, Village Nangli Poona, Near Tata Service Center, Delhi-110036 (hereinafter ‘subject land’). 2. It is the contention of the petitioner that the petitioner has purchased the subject land vide sale deed dated 18th February, 2026. 3. The petitioner has also filed complaint with the respondent no.4/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/05/2026 at 13:48:49 W.P.(C) 6253/2026 SHO, P.S. Swaroop Nagar regarding trespass and extortion. He has also filed a complaint regarding unauthorized construction with the respondents on 29th April, 2026. 4. Mr. Vikas Chopra, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.1/ MCD, on instructions, submits that the land belongs to the Gram Sabha, and hence, no sanctioned plan is required for carrying out the aforesaid construction. 5. At best, the case of the petitioner is that there is an illegal encroachment on the land of the petitioner, for which the appropriate remedy would be to initiate civil proceedings. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition along with the pending application is disposed of. AMIT BANSAL, J MAY 7, 2026 at This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/05/2026 at 13:48:49