Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8695 (KAR)

MRS. D. MYTHILI v. MR. VIGNESH. G

MFA/9809/2025 · 2026-02-12

Jayant Banerji, T M Nadaf

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.9809 OF 2025 BETWEEN MRS. D MYTHILI W/O MR. VIGNESH G AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS RESIDING AT: M13/12, SENGANTHAL FLATES, AYAPAKKAM, CHENNAI. …..Appellant s (By Sriyuths. Abhilash C. and Kriti, Advocates) AND MR. VIGNESH G S/O GANGAPATHY RAMA SUBRAMANIAN AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS RESIDING AT: PERMANENT RESIDENCE: NO.M4-405, SECTOR-6, KOODALPUDUR, MADURAI ALSO RESIDING AT: NO.106, AHK, MANGAMMANAPALYA MAIN ROAD, 7TH SECTOR, HSR LAYOUT BANGALORE. …….. Respondent MFA.No.9809/2025 ------------------------- 2 This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S.19(1) of the Family Courts Act, against the Judgment and Decree dated 15.09.2025 passed in M.C. No.3210/2021 on the file of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the appellant is permitted two weeks and no more time to remove the office objection/s, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without any further reference to this Court. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dated.12.02.2026, not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: BR R By: NR C By: STE