Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8691 (PAT)

Sudhir Kumar @ Bora Paswan @ Sudhir Paswan @ Sudhir Kumar Paswan @ Bora Kumar Paswan v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./25248/2026 · 2026-05-06

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25248 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2026 Thana- SIKRAUL District- Buxar ====================================================== Sudhir Kumar @ Bora Paswan @ Sudhir Paswan @ Sudhir Kumar Paswan @ Bora Kumar Paswan Son of Bharat Paswan R/o - Manoharpur, P.S - itarhi, District - Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Alias Ashok Karn For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 06-05-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Sikraul P.S. Case No. 06 of 2026 registered for offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 109, 50, 61(2), 103(1), 351(2), 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. Kanhaiya Chaubey and others went to the place of occurrence to forcibly harvest the agricultural field, and during the incident, Kanhaiya Chaubey opened fire and killed the deceased. 4. The name of the petitioner has come in the case on the self-inculpatory statement of the co-accused that he had also Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25248 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/2 participated in the occurrence which led to the murder of one person and injuring four persons. 5. Considering the nature and the gravity of the offence, this Court is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. 7. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the proceedings. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T