[2026:RJ-JP:22936] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2304/2026 Banwarilal S/o Mathuralal, Age 32 Years, R/o Aadalwada Kala, Police Station Choth Ka Barwada, District Sawaimadhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Tonk) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain Mr. Durgesh Kumar Jangid For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.) Order 04/06/2026 1. This instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 4/2026 registered at Police Station Newai Sadar, District Tonk for the offence(s) under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 112(2) & 61(2)(a) of BNS and Sections 66C & 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that accused-petitioner is behind the bars since long; that there is no criminal antecedent registered against the accused-petitioner; that similarly situated co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail; that conclusion of trial may take considerable time, and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- [2026:RJ-JP:22936] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2304/2026] petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused- petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused- petitioner but concurs with the fact that there is no criminal antecedent registered against the accused-petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, material available before the Court and the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 05.01.2026; that there is no criminal antecedent registered against the accused-petitioner; that similarly situated co-accused persons namely Devishanker, Bheem Singh and Manoj Kumar have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 27.05.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application Nos. 1836/2026, 1837/226 and 2303/2026; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Banwarilal S/o Mathuralal is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is [2026:RJ-JP:22936] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2304/2026] transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)),J 13/SHIVANI