Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC040008762024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/90/2026 Shri Karikho Kri Age: 51 Occupation : Address:aged about 51 years S/o Late Kotri Kri resident of Kri Niwas Telluliang village PO/PS Tezu district Lohit AP VERSUS Dr. Mohesh Chai and 3 Ors. Age: 0 Occupation : Address:aged about 51 years S/o Late Tankakso Chai resident of T. Chai residence Chai Colony Tezu PO/PS Lohit District AP 2:Shri Badang Tayang Age: 0 Occupation : Address:aged about 43 years S/o Shri Banumso Tayang reside tof Telluliang Village Tezu PO/PS Tezu Lohit district
Page No.# 2/4 AP 3:Ms. Jeremai Krong Age: 0 Occupation : Address:aged about 38 years D/o Late Turkho Krong resident of Changliang village Tezu PO/PS Tezu District Lohit AP 4:The Returning Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Address:for election to State Legislative Assembly for 44-Tezu(ST) Assembly Constituency Arunachal Pradesh PO/PS Tezu Lohit district AP ------------ Advocate for : Tanur Gao Advocate for : Dicky Panging Sr. Adv appearing for Dr. Mohesh Chai and 3 Ors.: Advocate , , , appearing for 2, 3, 4, respectively. Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 22.06.2026 Heard Mr. A. Tatak, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. M. Doji, learned counsel for opposite party No. 1; Mr. K. Mena, learned counsel for opposite party No. 2; and Ms. N. Anju, learned counsel for opposite party No. 4. This is an application praying for issuance of summons to the Plaintiff Witness Nos. 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14 to produce original documents and tender evidence on behalf of the election petitioner. Perused the application. The witnesses sought to be summoned appear to be necessary for the proper adjudication of the election petition, as they are official witnesses and the relevant documents are stated to be in their custody. Thus, I deem it appropriate to allow this application by issuing summons to the aforesaid plaintiff witnesses. Accordingly, let summons be issued to the following Plaintiff Witnesses:-
1. Witness No. 3- Inspector Dumgandu Singpho, Officer-In-Charge, Police Station Tezu, Arunachal Pradesh. 2. Witness No. 5- Sr. Sub Registrar, Kamrup(M), Assam. 3. Witness No. 6- The Returning Officer, 44- Tezu(ST) Assembly Constituency, Tezu, Arunachal Pradesh. Page No.# 4/4
4. Witness No. 7- Shri A. Mossang, Joint Secretary/PIO, Legislative Assembly, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh. 5.
Witness No. 8- The District Transport Officer (DTO), Tezu, Lohit District, Arunachal Pradesh. 6. Witness No. 9- The Branch Manager, HDFC Bank, Tezu Branch, Lohit District, Arunachal Pradesh. 7. Witness No. 10- The Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Tezu Branch, Lohit District, Arunachal Pradesh. 8. Witness No. 11- The Branch Manager, LIC, Branch Office Doomdooma, Tinsukia District, Assam. 9. Witness No. 12- The District Transport Officer (DTO), Itanagar Capital Region, Naharlagun, Arunachal Pradesh. 10. Witness No. 13- The Income Tax Officer, Ward No. 1 (1), Dibrugarh, Assam. 11. Witness No. 14- The Deputy Commissioner, Office of Commissioner, CGST & CX, Itanagar, Sector ‘A’, Naharlagun- 791110. Interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant