Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8690 (ALL)

PARAMJEET AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/22492/2026 · 2026-09-23

Ajay Bhanot, Divesh Chandra Samant

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22492 of 2026 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. After some arguments, Shri Devendra Pratap Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not wish to press the relief for quashing of the F.I.R. in the writ petition. The relief sought for quashing of the F.I.R. is accordingly declined. Shri Devendra Pratap Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner recasts his relief and prays that the petitioner may be granted leave to approach the competent court for anticipatory bail and for seeking other available legal remedies. The writ petition is disposed of with the observation that it is open to the petitioner to avail other legal remedies as may be advised. September 24, 2026 Vandit Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devendra Pratap Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Paramjeet And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VANDIT AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad