Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 869 (CHH)

DEV MALIK v. PRESIDENT/ SECRETARY

WPC/1418/2026 · 2026-03-31

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:14964 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1418 of 2026 Dev Malik S/o Late Dilip Malik Aged About 24 Years Caste Domar, R/o Ward No. 09, Pendra Dafai Manendragarh, P.S. And Tahsil Manendragarh, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - President/ Secretary Chhattisgarh State Bar Council Of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - Mayank Jain, Advocate (Advocate Sangh Manendragarh) Address- Civil Court Menendragarh District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur Chhattisgarh 3 - Sujay Kundu, Advocate (Advocate Sangh Manendragarh) Address- Civil Court Menendragarh, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Parveen Begam, Advocate (Advocate Sangh Manendragarh) Address- Civil Court Menendragarh, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Ramsevak Soni, Advocate For Respondent(s) : ---- (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 01.4.2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):- (i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue direction to respondent no. 1 to expeditious decide pending complaint made by the petitioner under section BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.04.02 17:28:32 +0530 2 35 of Advocate Act for seeking to cancel the license of the respondents no. 2 to 4 for illegal misconduct of their advocate profession, in the interest of justice. (ii) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case including cost of the petition, may also be granted. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file fresh better constituted petition. 3. On due consideration, the prayer is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty as sought for. 4. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini