[2026:RJ-JP:22346] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4302/2019 Tara Chand Saini S/o Shri Sitaram Saini B/c Mali, R/o Village Post Nethwa, Tehsil Ramgarh Shekhawati, District Sikar, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp. 2. Mahesh Kumar S/o Shri Shankar Lal B/c Sanwalka Mahajan, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Fatehpur, District Sikar, Raj., At Present R/o A-41-42, Dhiraj Poddar Road Par, Malad, East, Mumbai. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5640/2021 Mohan Lal Son Of Shri Laxman Ram, Resident Of Village Biraniya, Tehsil Fatehpur, District Sikar (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Mahesh Kumar Son Of Shri Shankar Lal, Resident Of Fatehpur, Police Station Fatehpur Kotwali, District Sikar (Raj). At Present R/o A-41-42 Dhiraj Poddar Road Park Malad, East Mumbai. ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2802/2024 1. Rajendra Hudda Son Of Shri Ramkaran Hudda, Resident Of Village Gangiyasar, Tehsil Fatehpur, District Sikar (Raj). 2. Dilip Kumar Lakhara Son Of Shri Shyam Lal Lakhara, Resident Of Village Dudhwa Khara, District Churu (Raj). 3. Mahesh Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Nathuram, Resident Of Khudi Mandelawas, Fatehpur Sadar, District Sikar (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. [2026:RJ-JP:22346] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3089/2024] 2. Mahesh Kumar Son Of Shri Shankar Lal, Resident Of Fatehpur, Police Station Fatehpur Kotwali, District Sikar (Raj). At Present R/o A-41-42 Dhiraj Poddar Road Park Malad, East Mumbai. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ripu Daman Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitender Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. GA JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 26/05/2026 It has been apprised by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the private respondents that after investigation, Final Report (Negative) was submitted by the Investigating Officer before the concerned Court. Against the aforesaid, a protest petition was submitted and thereafter, cognizance has been taken against the petitioners, and the petitioners have challenged the order of cognizance by way of filing revision petition under Sections 397 Cr.P.C. before the concerned Court. Counsel submits that under these circumstances, the instant petitions have become infructuous. The instant petitions are dismissed as rendered infructuous. Pending applications if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J RACHNA/31-34