Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8683 (JHR)

BABULAL YADAV v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11480/2025 · 2026-01-07

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:218 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11480 of 2025 Babulal Yadav, aged about 58 years, S/O Late Arjun Mahto, R/o-Chanddih, P.O.-Kharagdiha, P.S-Jamua, District-Giridih ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Kumar Rai, Advocate For the State : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, A.P.P --- 03/07.01.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The Petitioner has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Jamua P.S.Case No. 107/2025, registered for the offences under Sections 115(2)/118(1)/117(4)/109/3(5) and later on Section 103(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and though earlier this application was rejected; however, after that some development has taken place and charge has already been framed; however, no witness has been examined. He further submits that co-accused, namely, Ganesh Yadav and Vikash Yadav, who were also named in the F.I.R, have been granted bail by coordinate Bench of this Court in B.A. No. 8169 of 2025. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the allegation made in the F.I.R; coupled with the fact that the co-accused, namely, Ganesh Yadav and Vikash Yadav, who were also named in the F.I.R, have been granted bail by coordinate Bench of this Court in B.A. No. 8169 of 2025 and though charge has been framed and no witness has been examined as stated by learned A.P.P, I am 2026:JHHC:218 2 inclined to enlarge the Petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the above-named Petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Giridih, in connection with Jamua P.S.Case No. 107/2025. 6. It is made clear that the Petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witness and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against the Petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this Petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 7th January, 2026 jk Uploaded on 08/01/2026