Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8680 (GAU)

AKRAM ALI v. SUBHASISH BARUAH AND 2ORS

Cont.Cas(C)/202/2026 · 2026-06-21

Pranjal Das

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010070812026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/202/2026 AKRAM ALI S/O AKKAS ALI, A R/O VILL- KANHARA, P.S.- GOROIMARI, DIST- KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS SUBHASISH BARUAH AND 2ORS THE SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAMRUP AT AMINGAON, PIN- 781031 2:DIMPLE GAYARI THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE PALASHBARI POLICE STATION P.S.- PALASHBARI DIST- KAMRUP PIN-781128 3:HEM KANTA SHARMA INVESTIGATING OFFICER OF PALASHBARI P.S. CASE NO. 269/2025 ADDRESS- I/C RANI OUTPOST P.S.- PALASHBARI DIST- KAMRUP C/O OFFICER-IN-CHARGE PALASHBARI POLICE STATIO Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M A I HUSSAIN, MR. S. ALOM,MR. S H ZAMAN Advocate for the Respondent : MR. P P DUTTA(R1,2,3), MS. P P DAS(R1,2,3),MS P SARMA(R1,2,3) Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 22-06-2026 Mr. M.A.I Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner who has initiated this contempt proceeding, submits that in the meantime, the order dated 24.03.2026 passed by this Court in Crl. Rev. No. 78/2026 has been complied with and he prays for closing of this contempt petition. Mr. P.P Dutta, learned counsel appears for the respondent No. 1, 2 & 3. On considering the matter, I am of the considered view that there is no point in keeping this contempt proceeding as the petitioner is no longer aggrieved. Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant