Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8680 (BOM)

ARUN LAXMAN YADAV v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BA/463/2026 · 2026-09-16

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

P.H. JAYANI 502 BA463.2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 463 OF 2026 Arun Laxman Yadav …. Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra …Respondent Mr. Amit Icham for the Applicant. Ms. Kranti Hiwrale, APP for Respondent No.1 – State. Mr. Vilasini B., appointed Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. DATED : 16th SEPTEMBER, 2026 P.C. :- 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board. 2. Learned Counsel for the parties state that as recorded in the Order dated 13th August, 2026, the Applicant has paid the entire agreed amount to Respondent No.2. The matter is amicably settled between the parties. 3. Mr. Icham, learned Counsel for the Applicant states that the Applicant is going to file appropriate proceedings seeking quashing and setting of the subject matter FIR. 4. Ms. Vilasini B., learned Counsel, on instructions, states that in that case, Respondent No.2 will give her no objection to quash and set-aside the subject matter FIR as the matter is amicably settled between the parties outside the Court. 5. In view thereof, interim bail granted to the Applicant vide Order dated 13th August, 2026 is made absolute on the same conditions. 6. Bail Application stands disposed of in above terms. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) PREETI HEERO JAYANI Digitally signed by PREETI HEERO JAYANI Date: 2026.09.17 19:19:46 +0530