HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 1680 of 2026 Court No. - 54 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard Dr. Vishnu Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sudharshan Singh, leraned counsel for the private respondent. 2. Dr. Vishnu Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that after filing of the writ petition, the pending matter has been disposed of by the Consolidation authorities, as such, the instant writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Mr. Sudharshan Singh, leraned counsel for the private respondent has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. April 20, 2026 Rameez Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dr. Vishnu Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Dayanand And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Tehsil- Sakaldiha, Districtchandauli, Division- Varanasi And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad