Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8679 (AP)

Rapaka Bala Balaji Vara Prasad, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/17083/2022 · 2026-08-23

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010289992022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.17083 of 2022 Between: 1. RAPAKA BALA BALAJI VARA PRASAD,, S/O. LATE VENKATESWARA RAO, AGE 39 YEARS, R/O. 11-11, VINAYAKA TEMPLE STREET, YERRAMALLA, UNGUTURU MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. 2. RAPAKA PADMA,, W/O. LATE VENKATESWARA RAO, AGE 39 YEARS, R/O. 11-11, VINAYAKA TEMPLE STREET, YERRAMALLA, UNGUTURU MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU DISTRICT AT ELURU. 3. DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, GOVT. OF A.P, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT, LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA. KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, GOVT. OF A.P RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. ASST DIRECTOR, AREA, HOSPITAL, KOVVUR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. OFFICE OF VETERINARY HOSPITAL, TALLAPUDI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. RAPAKA SATYA SRI, W/O. ATRAGADDA VENKATESH, 24 YEARS, R/O. 6-103, PAIDIMETTA, TALLAPUDI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. RAPAKA VENKATA LAKSHMI SRI, W/O LATE VENKATESWARLU, 52 YEARS, R/O. 6-103, PAIDIMETTA, TALLAPUDI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. (AS PER THE AADHAR CARD) 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 6 in processing the application of the 7th and 8th respondent with regard to the retirement benefits of late Rapaka Venkateswarlu and also the appointment on compassionate ground without considering the objections of the petitioner dated 08-06-2022 requesting not to entertain the claim made by the 7th and 8th respondent and consider the claim of the petitioner as illegal, unjust , arbitrary and consequently directing the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner for payment of the death benefits of late Rapaka Venkateswarlu and also the request for appointment on compassionate ground. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO 2. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.17083 of 2022 ORDER: Sri T.V.S.Prabhakara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of the Writ Petition in terms of the memo of terms of compromise dated 04.08.2026. 2. The said memo of terms of compromise dated 04.08.2026 indicates that the unofficial respondents have paid an amount of Rs.8,00,000/- to the writ petitioners herein for allowing the 7th respondent to be appointed on compassionate grounds and also to claim pensionary and retirement benefits to the 8th respondent and the writ petitioners shall not claim appointment on compassionate grounds and retirement benefits of the deceased employee. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Office is directed to attach a copy of terms of compromise dated 04.08.2026 to this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 24.08.2026 siva 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.17083 of 2022 Date: 24.08.2026 siva