Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8673 (AP)

A NAGARAJU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/13447/2022 · 2026-08-23

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010225782022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.13447 of 2022 Between: 1. A NAGARAJU, S/O. LATE APPALARAJU, AGED ABOUT. 54 YEARS, W/AS DRIVER (U/R), VISAKHAPATNAM DEPOT-I, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. D.NO.6-44- 9/1,T.V.N.COLONY,OLD GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, LABOUR, FACTORIES, BOILERS AND INSURANCE MEDICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, D.NO.33-7-6-,33-8-14, PATURIS PAPAIH STREET X ROADS, SITARAMAPURAM,VIJAYAWADA-520002 3. THE CHAIRMAN INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM PRESIDING, OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, GVMC ZONE-III BUILDING, SURYABAGH,VISAKHAPATNAM-20. 4. THE DEPUTY CHIEF TRAFFIC MANAGER, , A.P.S.R.T.C, 0/0 THE REGIONAL MANAGER, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. THE DEPOT MANAGER, A.P.S.R.T.C,. VISAKHAPATNAM DEPOT-I,VISAKHAPATNAM, AP. 6. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, , APSRTC, VISAKHAPATNAM CUTY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, APSRTC, VIZIANANGARAM ZONE, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court 2 may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of certiorari calling the connected records including the orders ID.No.8/2020 dt.31-08- 2021 by the 3rd respondent and consequential orders vide G.O.Rt.No.226, Labour, Factories, Boilers and Insurance Medical Services(OP)Department, Dt.24- 09-2021 of the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and as the punishment of removal is totally disproportionate to the alleged charge and selective action and further declare that the petitioner is entitle for reinstatement with continuity of service with all consequential benefits. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SEENA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 2. SOLOMON RAJU MANCHALAFOR (APSRTC) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.13447 of 2022 ORDER: Ms. S.R.P.S.Sundari, learned counsel represented on behalf of Sri G.Seena Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of the present Writ Petition and the same is also endorsed on the bundle. Permission is accorded and accordingly the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 24.08.2026 siva 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.13447 of 2022 Date: 24.08.2026 siva