Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8672 (AP)

CHILAMKURTHI RAJA RAMACHANDRAN v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/10423/2024 · 2026-08-23

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010202282024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10423 OF 2024 Between: 1. CHILAMKURTHI RAJA RAMACHANDRAN, S/o. Late Sriramulu Naidu, Aged 50 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Door No. 7- 16-96, Valluruvari Thota, 9th Lanc, Guntur Town, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, AP Police Headquarters, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, A.P. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Machilipatnam, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh. 2 4. The Station House Officer, Chilakalapudi Police Station, Chilakalapudi, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th Respondent in involving in civil matters into the petitioner's vacant land measuring an extent of 1,113 Sq. Yards located in Sy. No. 298 at Rustambada area in Machilipatnam Town by calling the petitioners over phone and by sending his subordinates and threatening the petitioners without any authority or jurisdiction as illegal arbitrary unreasonable and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with life and liberty of the petitioners and their civil disputes and not to calling the petitioner to Police Station and not to detained him without following due process of law in respect of the land measuring an extent of 1,113 sq yards in Sy No 298 situated at Rustumbada Area in Machilipatnam Town and Declaring the action of 4th Respondent in not taking any action on the complaints dated. 14.04.2024 and 3 17.04.2024 submitted by the Petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India andconsequently, direct the 4th Respondent to consider and dispose of the complaints dated. 14.04.2024 and 17.04.2024 made by the petitioner and direct the Respondents to provide Police Aid for peaceful enjoyment of the aforementioned property by maintaining public peace and tranquility and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to directing the Respondent No. 4 not to interfere with life and liberty of the petitioners and their civil disputes and not to calling the petitioner to Police Station and not to detained him without following due process of law in respect of the land measuring an extent of 1,113 sq yards in Sy No 298 situated at Rustumbada Area in Machilipatnam pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass appropriate orders as an interim measure. 4 IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to directing the 4th Respondent to consider and register the complaints dated. 14.04.2024 and 17.04.2024 made by the petitioner and direct the Respondents to provide Police Aid for peaceful enjoyment of the aforementioned property by maintaining public peace and tranquillity., pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: V V S S SRIKANTH G Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10423 of 2024 The Court made the following Order: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home reported no objection for the same. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 24.08.2026 PSA 6 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10423 of 2024 Date: 24.08.2026 PSA