Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010091922026 2026:GAU-AS:8982 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1005/2026 SHRI JAYANTA KALITA AND ANR SON OF LATE GANESH KALITA 2: SMTI. RINKU MAHAPATRA @ RINKUMONI KALITA W/O SHRI JAYANTA KALITA BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF VILL- ADABOI P.O. AND P.S. SUALKUCHI DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781103 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. Z ARAFAT, MR. K M HASSAN,MR. J A AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 22.06.2026 Heard Mr. J.A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Page No.# 2/3 2. This is an application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioners, who were apprehended in connection with Sualkuchi P.S. Case No. 23/2026, under Sections 126(2)/118(2)/117(2)/296/3(5) of BNS, 2023 3. Case Diary called for has been received. 4. Although, the allegation is regarding causing of grievous injury by a machete, the medical report indicated only simple injury. 5. This Court vide Order dated 18.05.2026, had granted interim pre-arrest bail to the petitioner No. 2. 6. Having regard to the nature of the injury, the petitioner No. 1 is directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Authority in the event of his arrest in connection with Sualkuchi P.S. Case No. 23/2026, under Sections 126(2)/118(2)/117(2)/296/3(5) of BNS, 2023. 7. Further the order of interim bail in respect of petitioner No. 2 dated 18.05.2026 is also hereby made absolute on the following conditions which shall be applicable to both of the petitioners:- 1) that the petitioners shall fully co-operate with the investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required in Page No.# 3/3 connection with the investigation of the aforesaid P.S. case; and 2) that the petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. 8. The petition is disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant