Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 1297 of 2026 Anadi Charan Tripathy ..... Petitioner Mr. N. Rath, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 29.01.2026 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “It is therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this writ application and issue Mandamus in form Rule NISI to direct the opp. Parties to regularize entire period of service from the initial date of appointment and thereby entitling him of all the financial and pensionary benefit under the OCS (Pension) Rules, 1992 and GPF(O) Rules, 1938. And on their failing to show cause or showing insufficient cause, the said Rule be made absolute; And pass such other order(s)/direction(s)/writ(s) as this Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case; And for which act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” Page 2 of 2. 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No. 2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of her claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Jyoti