[2026:RJ-JP:22772] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16971/2025 Imran S/o Jaikam, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Khedlikaji, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.) Order 01/06/2026 1. This instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 360/2025 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 308(2) and 313 of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that accused-petitioner is behind the bars since long; conclusion of trial may take considerable time, and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. [2026:RJ-JP:22772] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16971/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that one another criminal antecedent is registered against the accused-petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and arguments advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties and considering the fact that recovery has already been effected; that charge-sheet has already been filed; accused- petitioner is behind the bars since 30.11.2025; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Imran S/o Jaikam is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. [2026:RJ-JP:22772] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16971/2025] 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)),J 18/SHIVANI