HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12183 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Heard Sri Durga Prasad, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri B.P. Maurya, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. 2. The present bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of applicants with a prayer to release her on bail in Case Crime No. 275 of 2025, under Sections 3(5), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 310(2), 115(2), 352, 132, 121(1), 118(1), 127(2), 324 BNS and Section 7 CLA Act, registered at Police Station Kurana, District Hamipur during pendency of the trial. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to delete the name of the applicant no. 2 from the array of parties as she has already filed separate bail application. 4. Prayer aforesaid is allowed. He may do so during course of day. 5. Now the application survives only in respect of applicant no. 1-Smt. Ranu@Kusma. 6. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and she has been falsely implicated in this case and she has been languishing in jail since 25.12.2025. It is further submitted that name of the applicant has surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused Ujail Babu. It is further submitted that co-accused Pushpa and Shyamkali have already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Durga Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Smt Ranu @ Kusma .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Court vide order dated 15.4.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 11587 of 2026 and another co-accused Smt. Gita has also been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 17.4.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 12910 of 2026. It is also submitted that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant and none of the injuries has been found to be dangerous to life. It is also submitted that the applicant undertakes that she will not misuse the liberty, if granted. It has also been pointed out that in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial. 7. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant. 8. Co-accused Pushpa and Shyamkali have already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court and another co-accused Smt. Gita has also been granted bail by this Court and name of the applicant has surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused Ujail Babu. No specific role has been assigned to the applicant and none of the injuries of the police personnel has been found to be dangerous to life. 9. Upon considering the totality of facts, nature and the evidence reflected from record and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for bail. Hence, the present bail application is ALLOWED. 10. Let the applicant- Smt Ranu @ Kusma involved in the aforesaid case crime shall be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned :- (i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses. BAIL No. 12183 of 2026 2 (iii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of B.N.S.S. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that she shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in the trial court. (v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through their counsel. 12. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 13. It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will, in no way, be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order. April 20, 2026 Abhishek BAIL No. 12183 of 2026 3 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad