Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8657 (AP)

PUPPALA RAMA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/23244/2023 · 2026-08-18

Balaji Medamalli

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010448492023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] WEDNESDAY, THE 19th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 23244/2023 Between: 1. PUPPALA RAMA RAO, S/O RANGA RAO, AGED 58 YEARS, PEDANA MUNCIPALITY, R/O. FLAT NO. T8, SHIRDI SAI APARTMENTS, BATUSUMUDI VILAAGE, BHIMAVARAM,534201, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI,GUNTUR DISTRICT ,ANDHRA PRADESH, 522238. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, , PRIME HILL CREST, 4TH FLOOR, NEAR DGP OFFICE, BESIDE ULTRATECH READYMIX PLANT, VADDESWARAM VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI,GUNTUR DIST ANDHRA PRADESH- 522502. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, BHIMAVARAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION TOWN HALL RD, GANDHINAGAR,WEST GODAVARI DIST BHIMAVARAM, 534201, ANDHRA PRADESH- 534202. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondent in not 2 considering the representation submitted by the petitioner is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 23-12-2022, Submitted by the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 23-12-2022 and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V ADITYA CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES IV 2. K SREEDHARA MURTHY (SC for Municipalities and Municipal Corporation services) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed for the following relief: “…pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondent in not considering the representation submitted by the petitioner is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondent No 2 to pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 23122022 Submitted by the petitioner and to pass…” 2. Ms K. Harshitha, learned counsel representing on behalf of Sri K. V. Aditya Chowdary, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition with a liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition with more comprehensive grounds and pleadings. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty as sought for. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any, shall stand closed. Interim orders granted earlier if any, also shall stand closed. ________________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Dated: 19.08.2026 BSM 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Writ Petition No. 23244 of 2023 Date: 19.08.2026 BSM