1 ( 2026:HHC:19337 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 446 of 2026 Decided on: 22.05.2026 ________________________________________________ Raj Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 21.05.2026, alongwith copy of Office Order dated 06.04.2026, wherein, it has been stated that in compliance to the directions passed by this Court, case of the petitioner has been decided by the Deputy Director of School Education, Chamba vide Office Order dated 06.04.2026. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:19337 ) 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to him under the law. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 22nd May, 2026 Judge (raman)