- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22477 CMP No. 297 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO.297 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. MR. SUDHIR KUMAR DOGRA S/O MAHARAJ KRISHAN SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS CURRENTLY RESIDING AT M5011, MARVEL ZEPHYR, BEHIND EON IT PARK, OFF GRANT ROAD, KHARADI, PUNE - 411014. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARSHAVARDHAN B. SHARMA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S EXPAT PROJECTS AND DEVELOPMENTS PVT LTD CURRENTLY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 01, A WING, 3RD FLOOR, CARLTON TOWERS, OLD AIRPORT ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 008. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. UDAY SHANKAR R MANJESHWAR, ADVOCATE) THIS CMP FILED UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, PRAYING TO ALLOW Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22477 CMP No. 297 of 2025 THE PRESENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITON AND APPOINT A SOLE ARBITRATOR UNDER THE SECTION 11(6) UNDER THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 IN TERMS OF LETTER OF INTENT DATED 05.06.2015 AND 25.06.2015 AT ANNEXURE - A AND B, RESPECTIVELY FRO RESOLUTION OF DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PARTIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Sri. Uday Shankar R. Manjeshwar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent places reliance on the Order dated 11.03.2026 passed by this Court in CMP No.299/2025 and submits that similar order may be passed in this Petition. 2. Having taken note of the submission made by the counsel appearing for the parties, the petition does not survive for consideration. However, following the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/S. DURO FELGUERA S.A. Vs. M/S. GANGAVARAM PORT LIMITED reported in (2017) 9 SCC 729, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to issue fresh notice to - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22477 CMP No. 297 of 2025 the respondent seeking invocation of the Arbitration Clause based upon two different agreements, in the circumstances of the case. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. All contentions of the parties are kept open. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 2 Sl No.: 30