Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8652 (ALL)

M/S HC INFRACITY PVT LTD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/38166/2026 · 2026-09-22

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38166 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. The petitioner Mr. Tanmay Sadh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Aditya Bhushan Singhal, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.3 on instructions assured the Court that since both the parties are before the revisional authority at Lucknow today and they gave undertaking that the revision be decided on basis of their respective written submissions, the revisional authority may be directed to pass final order on basis of material available and written submissions expeditiously. 2. Mr. Shyam Singh, learned counsel for the State has taken instructions that in such case the revisional authority will pass a reasoned order by 28th September, 2026. 3. The learned counsel for both rival parties are agreed that this writ petition be disposed of taking note of above assurance. 4. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of that in the event rival contesting parties gave undertaking as referred above the revisional authority will pass a reasoned order on basis of material available on record as well as respective written submissions by 28th September, 2026. September 23, 2026 Kumar Manish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Tanmay Sadh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Aditya Bhushan Singhal, C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) M/S Hc Infracity Pvt Ltd .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MANISH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad