SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS SPLA No. 17 of 2026 With CRLA No. 60 of 2026 Rakhi Saxena --Appellant Versus Poonam Arya --Respondent Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Mukul Dangi, learned counsel for the Appellant. 2. As per the office report dated 27.03.2026, notice has been personally served upon the Respondent; however, there is no representation on behalf of the Respondent. 3. The Trial Court record has been received. 4. Let the paper book be supplied to the learned counsel for the parties, as per Rules. 5. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant on the application seeking leave to appeal, filed under Section 419(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 24.11.2025, passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haldwani, District Nainital, in Criminal Case No. 3369 of 2022, titled “Rakhi Saxena vs. Poonam Arya”, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 6. After hearing learned counsel for the Appellant, and considering that service upon the Respondent is sufficient and there is no representation on behalf of the Respondent, this Court is of the view that sufficient grounds exist to grant leave. Accordingly, the Special Leave to Appeal is allowed. 7. Objections, if any, may be filed by the Respondent. 8. List this case on 21.04.2026. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 31.03.2026 SB