[2026:RJ-JP:22830] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3757/2026 1. Sajid S/o Aaseen, Aged 25 Years, R/o Village Bamanwadi, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present In Sub Jail Kaman, Deeg). 2. Avid S/o Aaseen, Aged 22 Years, R/o Village Bamanwadi, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present In Sub Jail Kaman, Deeg). 3. Aaseen S/o Abdul, Aged 45 Years, R/o Village Bamanwadi, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present In Sub Jail Kaman, Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan Mr. Anil Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.) Order 02/06/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 42/2026 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 308(2), 313, 61(2)(a) of BNS and under Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; that the charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that [2026:RJ-JP:22830] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3757/2026] accused-petitioners are in custody since long; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that accused-petitioners may be granted the ben- efit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove and concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against accused-petitioners. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 26.01.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioners; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners namely Sajid S/o Aaseen, Avid S/o Aaseen and Aaseen S/o Abdul are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:22830] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3757/2026] 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)),J 60/KAVISH