Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8638 (PNJ)

RAMANJIT KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/3142/2026 · 2026-03-19

Surya Partap Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-3142 IN T 191 RAMANJI STATE OF CORAM: Present: SURYA P 1. directions t the respond 2. the petition P-6) before the respond stipulated t 3. 3142-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ CHANDIGA ANJIT KAUR & ANR. VERSUS TE OF PUNJAB & ORS. AM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUR Mr. Harpal S. Sindhu, Advoca Mr. I.P.S. Sabharwal, DAG, P YA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has be tions to the respondents No.1 to 3 to espondents No.4 and 5. The learned counsel represen petitioner has filed the representatio before the respondent No.2. The learn espondent No.2 to decide the abovem lated time. Notice of motion to the respo PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT DIGARH CRWP-3142-2026 (O&M DECIDED ON: 19.03.202 .....PETITIONER RSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH dvocate for the petitioners. AG, Punjab. as been filed by the petitioners f to protect their life and liberty fro presenting the petitioners submits th entation dated 11.03.2026 (Annexu e learned counsel prays for directions bovementioned representation within respondents No.1 to 3 only. O&M) 03.2026 NERS DENTS ers for rty from its that nnexure tions to within a VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.03.20 12:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-3142        disposing o the respon accordingly 6. hereby disp representati within a pe is further d security to that any ob perception authority o assessment the issue of  Vinod   W W  3142-2026 (O&M) 2             Learned counsel for the petiti sing of the representation of the petit respondent No.2 and that the instan rdingly. Keeping in view the aforesaid y disposed of with a direction to th sentation of the petitioner (Annexure in a period of 15 days from the date of rther directed that the petitioners shall rity to protect their life and liberty, if any observation is not being made by ption to the petitioners or the validi rity of concerned District shall be sment of the threat perception to the p sue of providing adequate security to t            Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes Whether reportable : Ye #" $ %&   !""  " petitioners submits that a direction fo e petitioner (Annexure P-6) be given instant writ petition be disposed o resaid facts, the present writ petition to the respondent No.2 to decide t exure P-6) by passing a speaking ord ate of receipt of copy of instant order. s shall be provided requisite safety an erty, if required. It is however clarifie ade by this Court with regard to thre validity of their marriage. The polic at liberty to make an independe o the petitioners, and take a decision o ity to them.      :Yes/No : Yes/No     tion for given to osed of tition is cide the ng order order. It fety and clarified to threat e police pendent ision on VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.03.20 12:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document