RAMANJIT KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/3142/2026 · 2026-03-19
Surya Partap Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8638 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8638 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-3142
IN T
191
RAMANJI
STATE OF
CORAM:
Present:
SURYA P
1.
directions t the respond
2.
the petition P-6) before the respond stipulated t
3.
3142-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ CHANDIGA
ANJIT KAUR & ANR.
VERSUS TE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
AM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUR
Mr. Harpal S. Sindhu, Advoca Mr. I.P.S. Sabharwal, DAG, P YA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL)
The instant petition has be tions to the respondents No.1 to 3 to espondents No.4 and 5.
The learned counsel represen petitioner has filed the representatio before the respondent No.2. The learn espondent No.2 to decide the abovem lated time.
Notice of motion to the respo
PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT DIGARH
CRWP-3142-2026 (O&M DECIDED ON: 19.03.202
.....PETITIONER RSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH dvocate for the petitioners. AG, Punjab. as been filed by the petitioners f to protect their life and liberty fro presenting the petitioners submits th entation dated 11.03.2026 (Annexu e learned counsel prays for directions bovementioned representation within respondents No.1 to 3 only.
O&M) 03.2026
NERS DENTS ers for rty from its that nnexure tions to within a VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.03.20 12:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-3142
disposing o the respon accordingly
6.
hereby disp representati within a pe is further d security to that any ob perception authority o assessment the issue of
Vinod W W 3142-2026 (O&M) 2
Learned counsel for the petiti sing of the representation of the petit respondent No.2 and that the instan rdingly.
Keeping in view the aforesaid y disposed of with a direction to th sentation of the petitioner (Annexure in a period of 15 days from the date of rther directed that the petitioners shall rity to protect their life and liberty, if any observation is not being made by ption to the petitioners or the validi rity of concerned District shall be sment of the threat perception to the p sue of providing adequate security to t
Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes Whether reportable : Ye
#"
$ %& !""
" petitioners submits that a direction fo e petitioner (Annexure P-6) be given instant writ petition be disposed o resaid facts, the present writ petition to the respondent No.2 to decide t exure P-6) by passing a speaking ord ate of receipt of copy of instant order. s shall be provided requisite safety an erty, if required. It is however clarifie ade by this Court with regard to thre validity of their marriage. The polic at liberty to make an independe o the petitioners, and take a decision o ity to them.
:Yes/No : Yes/No
tion for given to osed of tition is cide the ng order
order. It fety and clarified to threat e police pendent ision on VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.03.20 12:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document