[2026:RJ-JP:22968] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8257/2026 Babulal Meena S/o Laturlal, Age 46 Years, R/o Bawadi Kheda, P.S. Chhabara, District Baran, At Present House No. A-58 Near Chouthmata Temple, Atwal Nagar, Police Station Borkheda, District Kota City (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ripudaman Singh & Mr. Dinesh Singh (through VC) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.) Order 04/06/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 184/2025 registered at Police Station R K Puram, District Kota City for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 8 and 15 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case on the disclosure statement of the co-accused persons namely Harjinder Singh and Jasveer Singh, who have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by [2026:RJ-JP:22968] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8257/2026] keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove and concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the poppy husk recovered in this case, is below commercial quantity and that too has been recovered from the co-accused persons namely Harjinder Singh and Jasveer Singh, who have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.01.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15870/2025; that the accused-petitioner is not required for further investigation; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 15.05.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused- petitioner; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Babulal Meena S/o Laturlal is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court [2026:RJ-JP:22968] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8257/2026] and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)),J 128/KAVISH