Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8631 (BOM)

RAHUL SATISH SURASHE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

BA/1528/2026 · 2026-09-08

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

8nobBA1528-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1528 OF 2026 Rahul Satish Surashe Versus The state of Maharashtra and another … Mr. Eklavya S. Potdar, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. D. J. Patil, APP for the State CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. Dated : 8th September, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. The learned Advocate for the applicant submits that during pendency of the present application, the investigation is completed and charge sheet has been filed. On instructions, he seeks leave to withdraw the present application with liberty to file a fresh application before the trial court with copy of the charge sheet. Leave granted. 2. The Bail Application stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh Application along-with charge-sheet before the learned Trial Court. 3. If the applicant prefers the fresh bail application, the trial court shall consider it on its own merits. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) JPChavan 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:41862