Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 863 (RAJ)

MAHAVEER SINGH KURI S/O SHRI KAJOD MAL v. THE RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

CW/3549/2026 · 2026-03-10

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10183] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3549/2026 Mahaveer Singh Kuri S/o Shri Kajod Mal, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village Simrala Jagir Via Mehrauli, Tehsil Shri Madhopur, Distt. Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur Through Chairman Cum Managing Director (Raj.) 2. The Executive Director (Admin), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Srimadhopur Depot, Distt. Sikar (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya with Ms. Palak Rohilla For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajpal Dhankhar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 10/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that since, the issue involved in the instant writ petition has been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Dauji Prasad & Ors. Vs. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14614/2024) decided on 30.10.2025, therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit representation. [2026:RJ-JP:10183] (2 of 2) [CW-3549/2026] 2. In view of limited prayer, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit representation before the respondents and in case, after examining the representation, the respondents find that case of the petitioner is also covered by the judgments in the case of Dauji Prasad (supra) as well as Tara Chand Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8810/2014) decided on 25.01.2017, referred in the order dated 30.10.2025, then similar benefits shall be granted to the petitioner. 3. Necessary exercise shall be carried out within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/30