IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12628 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2015 Thana- BHAPTIAHI District- Supaul ====================================================== Md. Sakur @ Abdul Sakur S/o Late Md. Rahim Miyan @ Abdul Rahim Resident of Village- Chitahi Hanuman Nagar, P.S.- Bhaptiyahi, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md Harun Quareshi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 23-03-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 379, 504, 506, 307 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case but inadvertently at Para-3 it has been pleaded that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and petitioner is aged about 71 years the informant alleges that the accused persons were trying to capture the land by erecting a house over the same, on objection, petitioner assaulted by farsha causing injury on head of Md. Yunus on instigation of Md. Taiyab, thereafter Md. Yusuf and Md. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12628 of 2026(2) dt.23-03-2026 2/3 Khurshid dashed her on the ground and accused assaulted her and also assaulted her brother-in-law by danda and Md. Safeed snatched her chain. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant on account of dispute relating to land being karta of his family. It is next submitted that petitioner is alleged to have assaulted Md. Yunus by farsha causing injury on head. It is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the blow was not repeated and the injury has been opined to be simple in nature and petitioner is a senior citizen. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also taking into consideration the fact that petitioner is a senior citizen, the petitioner above- named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12628 of 2026(2) dt.23-03-2026 3/3 in connection with Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No.44/2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T