Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:22971] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8089/2026 Shyamlal S/o Ratan Lal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Phagi, Police Station Phagi, District Jaipur Rural. Presently Subhash Colony, Ladpura, Todaraisingh, Police Station Todaraisingh, District Tonk (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer, District Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nawab Ali Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)
Order 04/06/2026
1. The instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioner in connection with the impugned FIR No. 52/2017 registered with the Police Station Bhinai District Ajmer for the offences punishable under Section(s) 342, 365, 395, and 307 of IPC in which charge-sheet has been submitted under Section(s) 147, 148, 323, 325, 307, 365 read with 149 of IPC
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case.
Learned counsel submits that the accused-petitioner has not been named in the FIR and the co-accused persons who have been named in the FIR has already been acquitted by the trial court and similarly situated co-accused Kamaluddin @ Kamal has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate bench of this court.
[2026:RJ-JP:22971] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8089/2026]
Learned counsel further submits that the injury sustained by injured was neither fatal nor dangerous to life; that there is no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner.
Learned counsel submits that the accused-petitioner has been in custody since long and the trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore, indulgence of bail may be granted to the petitioner.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application but concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record.
5. Having considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, and taking into account the fact that the accused-petitioner is not named in the FIR and the other co- accused Kamaluddin @ Kamal who is named in the FIR has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 19.05.2026 passed in SB criminal misc. bail application No. 7183/2026. There are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner; that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 30.04.2026 and that the trial is likely to take considerable time for its conclusion. Hence, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, considers it just and proper to extend the benefit of bail to the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of the BNSS
6. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Shyamlal S/o Ratan Lal, arrested in connection with the aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he
[2026:RJ-JP:22971] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8089/2026] furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with two surety bonds of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all the dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so.
7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. In case of breach of the condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA (V.J.)),J 110/ashu/416